"Parse a style value for <foo>", where we don't care if it's a literal
<foo> or a calculated one, is a really common thing that we previously
didn't have methods for.
A couple of methods we had have been extended to parse calc(), and the
others have been filled in.
The method for parsing the `flex` property's value is renamed
`parse_flex_shorthand_value()` as it conflicted.
Instead of serializing two calc() values to String and then comparing
those strings, we can now compare calc() values by actually traversing
their internal CalculationNode tree.
This makes style recomputation faster on pages with lots of calc()
values since it's now much cheaper to check whether a property with
some calc() value actually changed.
Since we always pass the px value as an argument to resolved(), we can
pass it directly as CSSPixels instead of wrapping it in Length. This
approach allows us to avoid converting to a double, resulting in fewer
precision issues.
VALUES-4 defines the internal representation of `calc()` as a tree of
calculation nodes. ( https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#calc-internal )
VALUES-3 lacked any definition here, so we had our own ad-hoc
implementation based around the spec grammar. This commit replaces that
with CalculationNodes representing each possible node in the tree.
There are no intended functional changes, though we do now support
nested calc() which previously did not work. For example:
`width: calc( 42 * calc(3 + 7) );`
I have added an example of this to our test page.
A couple of the layout tests that used `calc()` now return values that
are 0.5px different from before. There's no visual difference, so I
have updated the tests to use the new results.
Level 4 drops the limitations of what types can be a denominator, which
means `<calc-number-sum>`, `<calc-number-product>` and
`<calc-number-value>` all go away.
