If we define a property with just a setter/getter (not both) we must:
- take the previous getter/setter if defined on the actual object
- overwrite the other to nullptr if it is from a prototype
In get_own_properties:
Entries which are deleted while iterating need to be skipped
In PropertyDescriptor::from_dictionary
If the getter/setter is undefined it should still mark it as present
The specification defines that we should only change attributes that
exist in the incoming descriptor, but since we currently just overwrite
the existing descriptor with the new one, we can just set the missing
attributes to the existing values manually.
This commit expands on 5eef07d232 by
automatically trying to coerce Type::String PropertyNames into numbers
when a caller checks if the PropertyName is_number/is_string.
This has several benefits:
- We no longer have to duplicate the number coercion code to every
function that accepts a PropertyNumber. (Or more likely, forget to.)
- This keeps the lazy nature of only doing the coercion when and if
there is a semantic difference to the different PropertyName types,
which means this shouldnt cause any performance drop.
- Since this coercion changes the state of the PropertyName itself the
result is essentially cached and can speed up any repeat uses of the
same PropertyName instance.
This now matches the spec's OrdinaryObjectCreate() across the board:
instead of implicitly setting the created object's prototype to
%Object.prototype% and then in many cases setting it to a nullptr right
away, it now has an 'Object* prototype' parameter with _no default
value_. This makes the code easier to compare with the spec, very clear
in terms of what prototype is being used as well as avoiding unnecessary
shape transitions.
Also fixes a couple of cases were we weren't setting the correct
prototype.
There's no reason to assume that the object would not be empty (as in
having own properties), so let's follow our existing pattern of
Type::create(...) and simply call it 'create'.
We were doing a *lot* of string-to-int conversion while creating a new
global object. This happened because Object::put() would try to convert
the property name (string) to an integer to see if it refers to an
indexed property.
Sidestep this issue by using PropertyName for the CommonPropertyNames
struct on VM (vm.names.foo), and giving PropertyName a flag that tells
us whether it's a string that *may be* a number.
All CommonPropertyNames are set up so they are known to not be numbers.
As mentioned on Discord earlier, we'll add these to all new functions
going forward - this is the backfill. Reasons:
- It makes you look at the spec, implementing based on MDN or V8
behavior is a no-go
- It makes finding the various functions that are non-compliant easier,
in the future everything should either have such a comment or, if it's
not from the spec at all, a comment explaining why that is the case
- It makes it easier to check whether a certain abstract operation is
implemented in LibJS, not all of them use the same name as the spec.
E.g. RejectPromise() is Promise::reject()
- It makes it easier to reason about vm.arguments(), e.g. when the
function has a rest parameter
- It makes it easier to see whether a certain function is from a
proposal or Annex B
Also:
- Add arguments to all functions and abstract operations that already
had a comment
- Fix some outdated section numbers
- Replace some ecma-international.org URLs with tc39.es
This is very similar to Object::define_native_property, but here the
native functions are exported as standalone JS getter and setter
functions, instead of being transparently called by interactions with
the property.
This would return an empty value once it hits an exception check
otherwise. Considering that this mostly is used in situations where we
already *do* have an exception (traceback printing, for example), let's
make this easier for ourselves to use.
SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized
way of representing file license information.
See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers
This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool.
ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
This was failing to take two things into account:
- When constructing a PropertyName from a value, it won't automatically
convert to Type::Number for something like string "0", even though
that's how things work internally, since indexed properties are stored
separately. This will be improved in a future patch, it's a footgun
and should happen automatically.
- Those can't be looked up on the shape, we have to go through the
indexed properties instead.
Additionally it now operates on the shape or indexed properties directly
as define_property() was overly strict and would throw if a property was
already non-configurable.
Fixes#6469.
Similar to Value::to_string_without_side_effects() this is mostly a
regular object property lookup, but with the guarantee that it will be
side-effect free, i.e. no accessors or native property functions will
be called. This is needed when we want to access user-controlled object
properties for debug logging, for example. The specific use case will be
error objects which will soon no longer have internal name/message
properties, so we need to guarantee that printing an error, which may
already be the result of an exception, won't blow up in our face :^)
This fixes two cases of indexed access (array holes, out-of-bounds
string object access) where we would not follow the prototype chain and
incorrectly return undefined:
// Should be "a", returned undefined
Object.setPrototypeOf([,], ["a"])[0]
// Should be "a", returned undefined
Object.setPrototypeOf(new String(""), new String("a"))[0]
The actual fix is simple, instead of returning early if the requested
index is past the string's length or within the indexed properties size
but has no value, we just continue the prototype chain traversal and get
correct behaviour from that.
This replaces the current 'function plus boolean indicating the type'
API, which makes it easier to set both getter and setter at once.
This was already possible before but required two calls of this
function, which wasn't intuitive:
define_accessor(name, getter, true, ...);
define_accessor(name, setter, false, ...);
Which now becomes:
define_accessor(name, getter, setter, ...);
Letting these create and return a JS::Array directly is pretty awkward
since we then need to go through the indexed properties for iteration.
Just use a MarkedValueList (i.e. Vector<Value>) for this and add a new
Array::create_from() function to turn the Vector into a returnable
Array as we did before.
This brings it a lot closer to the spec as well, which uses the
CreateArrayFromList abstract operation to do exactly this.
There's an optimization opportunity for the future here, since we know
the Vector's size we could prepare the newly created Array accordingly,
e.g. by switching to generic storage upfront if needed.
