The DOM spec defines what it means for an element to be an "editing
host", and the Editing spec does the same for the "editable" concept.
Replace our `Node::is_editable()` implementation with these
spec-compliant algorithms.
An editing host is an element that has the properties to make its
contents effectively editable. Editable elements are descendants of an
editing host. Concepts like the inheritable contenteditable attribute
are propagated through the editable algorithm.
This change implements spec-conformant computation of default ARIA roles
for elements whose expected default role depends on the element’s
context — specifically, either on the element’s ancestry, or on whether
the element has an accessible name, or both. This affects the “aside”,
“footer”, “header”, and “section” elements.
Otherwise, without this change, “aside”, “footer”, “header”, and
“section” elements may unexpectedly end up with the wrong default roles.
Resulting in a massive rename across almost everywhere! Alongside the
namespace change, we now have the following names:
* JS::NonnullGCPtr -> GC::Ref
* JS::GCPtr -> GC::Ptr
* JS::HeapFunction -> GC::Function
* JS::CellImpl -> GC::Cell
* JS::Handle -> GC::Root
We currently have 2 virtual methods to inform DOM::Element subclasses
when an attribute has changed, one of which is spec-compliant. This
patch removes the non-compliant variant.
The main motivation behind this is to remove JS specifics of the Realm
from the implementation of the Heap.
As a side effect of this change, this is a bit nicer to read than the
previous approach, and in my opinion, also makes it a little more clear
that this method is specific to a JavaScript Realm.
After you mark a node as needing new style, there's no situation in
which we don't want a style update to happen, so just take care of
scheduling it automatically.
Bring the names of various boxes closer to spec language. This should
hopefully make things easier to understand and hack on. :^)
Some notable changes:
- LayoutNode -> Layout::Node
- LayoutBox -> Layout::Box
- LayoutBlock -> Layout::BlockBox
- LayoutReplaced -> Layout::ReplacedBox
- LayoutDocument -> Layout::InitialContainingBlockBox
- LayoutText -> Layout::TextNode
- LayoutInline -> Layout::InlineNode
Note that this is not strictly a "box tree" as we also hang inline/text
nodes in the same tree, and they don't generate boxes. (Instead, they
contribute line box fragments to their containing block!)
HTMLElement is the only interface that includes ElementContentEditable
in the HTML specification. This makes sense, as Element is also a base
class for elements in other specifications such as SVG,
which definitely shouldn't be editable.
Also adds a test for the attribute based on what Andreas did in the
video that added it.
LibWeb keeps growing and the Web namespace is filling up fast.
Let's put DOM stuff into Web::DOM, just like we already started doing
with SVG stuff in Web::SVG.
