I couldn't find anything in the specs about this, but GMail uses
empty generated boxes (`::before` and `::after` with `content: ""`)
inside a flexbox container in order to vertically center things.
The flexbox spec tells us to not generate flex items for empty
*anonymous* boxes, so we continue not doing that, but generated boxes
(any pseudo-element box) now always produce a flex item. This probably
isn't perfect either, and we'll have to revisit it for stuff like
`::first-letter`.
This is a monster patch that turns all EventTargets into GC-allocated
PlatformObjects. Their C++ wrapper classes are removed, and the LibJS
garbage collector is now responsible for their lifetimes.
There's a fair amount of hacks and band-aids in this patch, and we'll
have a lot of cleanup to do after this.
This disables this system progress bar, and instead creates one
out of pseudo elements, that can be selected and styled with the
::-webkit-progress-bar/value selectors.
Due to a missing `return` statement, we were creating two anonymous
wrapper blocks around each piece of inline content inside a flex
container.
This had no visual impact, since they ended up with 0x0 dimensions,
but we were wasting a fair bit of time running layout on them.
Make sure we use the create_anonymous_wrapper() helper function whenever
wrapping inline content in anonymous wrapper blocks. We were forgetting
to do this in one case, which led to some wrapper blocks having 0px
font-size and line-height.
This was implemented too rigidly, which made it impossible to place
floats correctly when they occurred in inline flow.
The new invariant is "all in-flow children must be either inline or
block". Out-of-flow children like floating and absolutely positioned
boxes are ignored when deciding when to generate anonymous boxes.
This makes SVG-in-HTML behave quite a bit better by following general
replaced layout rules. It also turns <svg> elements into inline-level
boxes instead of block-level boxes.
TreeBuilder wasn't taking advantage of the fact that we already have
computed style cached on each DOM::Element by the time we're
constructing a layout tree.
So instead of using the cached style, we recomputed it from scratch for
every element. This was done because invalidation was broken in many
places, but now that it's more or less trustworthy, stop recomputing
style on the fly in TreeBuilder and use what the preceding style update
pass gave us instead.
This basically cuts style computation work in half. :^)
Let's make it very clear that these are *computed* values, and not at
all the specified values. The specified values are currently discarded
by the CSS cascade algorithm.
1. Make this decision *after* we've inserted the layout node into the
layout tree. Otherwise, we can't reach its containing block!
2. Per css-sizing-3, consider auto-sized blocks whose sizes resolve
solely against other definite sizes as definite themselves.
In particular, (2) makes us consider width:auto block children of a
definite-size containing block as having definite size. This becomes
very important in flex layout.
Previously, these were added during layout. This didn't fit into the new
world where layout doesn't mutate the tree incrementally, so this patch
adds logic to Layout::TreeBuilder for adding a marker to each list-item
box after its children have been constructed.
Instead of making each Layout::Node compute style for itself, we now
compute it in TreeBuilder before even calling create_layout_node().
For non-element DOM nodes, we create the style and layout tree node
in TreeBuilder. This allows us to move create_layout_node() from
DOM::Node to DOM::Element.
There's a subtle difference here. A "block box" in the spec is a
block-level box, while a "block container" is a box whose children are
either all inline-level boxes in an IFC, or all block-level boxes
participating in a BFC.
Notably, an "inline-block" box is a "block container" but not a "block
box" since it is itself inline-level.
Until now, we've internally thought of the CSS "display" property as a
single-value property. In practice, "display" is a much more complex
property that comes in a number of configurations.
The most interesting one is the two-part format that describes the
outside and inside behavior of a box. Switching our own internal
representation towards this model will allow for much cleaner
abstractions around layout and the various formatting contexts.
Note that we don't *parse* two-part "display" yet, this is only about
changing the internal representation of the property.
Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display
Our existing implementation did not check the element type of the other
pointer in the constructors and move assignment operators. This meant
that some operations that would require explicit casting on raw pointers
were done implicitly, such as:
- downcasting a base class to a derived class (e.g. `Kernel::Inode` =>
`Kernel::ProcFSDirectoryInode` in Kernel/ProcFS.cpp),
- casting to an unrelated type (e.g. `Promise<bool>` => `Promise<Empty>`
in LibIMAP/Client.cpp)
This, of course, allows gross violations of the type system, and makes
the need to type-check less obvious before downcasting. Luckily, while
adding the `static_ptr_cast`s, only two truly incorrect usages were
found; in the other instances, our casts just needed to be made
explicit.
An svg layout element without a `SVGSVGElement` ancestor caused a failed
assertion before, because the svg context does not exist when `paint()`
is called
SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized
way of representing file license information.
See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers
This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool.
ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
As the spec for the table fixup algorythm says:
> Treat table-row-groups in this spec also encompass the specialized
> table-header-groups and table-footer-groups.
This is because it includes the initial node that the function was
called on, which makes it "inclusive" as according to the spec.
This is important as there are non-inclusive variants, particularly
used in the node mutation algorithms.
(...and ASSERT_NOT_REACHED => VERIFY_NOT_REACHED)
Since all of these checks are done in release builds as well,
let's rename them to VERIFY to prevent confusion, as everyone is
used to assertions being compiled out in release.
We can introduce a new ASSERT macro that is specifically for debug
checks, but I'm doing this wholesale conversion first since we've
accumulated thousands of these already, and it's not immediately
obvious which ones are suitable for ASSERT.
Elements with shadow roots will now recurse into those shadow trees
while building the layout tree.
This is the first step towards basic Shadow DOM support. :^)
