Having two ways that `<position>` is represented is awkward and
unnecessary. So, let's combine the two paths together. This first step
copies and modifies the `parse_position()` code to produce a
`PositionStyleValue`.
Apart from returning a StyleValue, this also makes use of automatic enum
parsing instead of manually comparing identifier strings.
Instead of a StringView. This allows us to preserve the nice O(1) string
compare property of FlyString, and not needing to allocate when one is
needed.
Ideally all other places in Token should have similar changes done, but
to prevent a huge amount of churn, just change ident for now.
Now, the 'object-position' property gets properly parsed and is
provided to the rest of the ecosystem.
In the parser we use the same parsing as for the background-position,
which is not entirely correct but almost a <position>.
Passing a value of a type different than number or length-percentage
to transform-origin returned a null pointer, and we didn't take care
of that path before.
This patch fixes a crash caused by an incorrect CSS declaration, such as
`transform-origin: "center"`.
Fixes#21609
When parsing these, <number> is allowed anywhere that would usually
allow a <length>, <length-percentage>, or <angle>. The spec is not
clear on exactly how this should work
(see https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/792 ) so I'm using some
artistic license until things are clearer:
- If we expected a <length>, treat the <number> as pixels.
- If we expected an <angle>, treat the <number> as degrees.
- Only allow direct <number> tokens, not calc() or other functions.
From what I can tell this is what the spec *intended* but I may be very
wrong. In any case, telling the ParsingContext whether we're parsing
one of these attributes is a cleaner approach and more correct than
temporarily enabling quirks mode, which we did previously.
The `to_string()` for this is modified a little from the original,
because we have to calculate what the layer-count is then, instead of
having it already calculated.
This fixes the sizing of the arrow icons displayed to the left of
parent sections on a table of contents on Wikipedia articles, which
are sized using the equation `calc(max(0.75em, 12px))`. Now, the icon
will not expand past the edges of the box they are within, avoiding
clipping the edges of the arrows.
Previously we made StringStyleValues from these, but once we start
actually quoting StringStyleValues when serializing them, this will
break the font-family serialization.
This one is a bit fun because it can be `add(<integer>)` or `auto-add`,
but children have to inherit the computed value not the specified one.
We also have to compute it before computing the font-size, because of
`font-size: math` which will be implemented later.
This is a `<display-inside>` keyword added by the MathML spec, and has
the rough meaning of "display in the default way". It enables the
standard layout rules for each MathML element (and is ignored for
anything that isn't a MathML element).
I believe we'll need an actual MathML formatting context to do the
layout correctly, but we can at least support a couple of elements that
behave the same as HTML ones.
Previously we were overly generous in what we accepted for `display`.
For example, we accepted:
- Multiple outside or inside identifiers
- Unrecognized identifiers
- Non-identifier tokens
Now, we reject all these cases. This makes us stop accepting the
`display: block math;` declaration in `MathML/Default.css`, and so the
one layout test we have containing MathML elements has changed to
reflect that.
Support the optional `<attr-type>` parameter to the `attr()` function,
which allows parsing the attribute's value as a variety of types,
instead of always as a string.
Resolving typed `attr()` functions is going to involve using more
internal Parser methods, so this is the simplest solution for that.
Also... resolving these is basically parsing them, so it makes more
sense for that process to live here.
This is just moving code, with minimal changes so it still works.
This is intended to annotate conversions from unknown floating-point
values to CSSPixels, and make it more obvious the fp value will be
rounded to the nearest fixed-point value.
In general it is not safe to convert any arbitrary floating-point value
to CSSPixels. CSSPixels has a resolution of 0.015625, which for small
values (e.g. scale factors between 0 and 1), can produce bad results
if converted to CSSPixels then scaled back up. In the worst case values
can underflow to zero and produce incorrect results.
- Ambiguous `raw_value()` method is replaced with `line_number()` and
`span()`.
- `line_name()` that before returned either line name or area name is
replaced with `line_name()` and `area_name()`.
- `Position` type is replaced with `Line` and `Area` type so we don't
have to guess while doing layout.
Affected test expectations:
- `template-lines-and-areas` - improvement over what we had before.
- `named-tracks` - rebaseline a giant test. will have to split it into
smaller tests in the future.
Reuse the check from IdentifierStyleValue in the CSS Parser, instead of
duplicating it. This might not be the ideal place to put it, but it
works for now.
Note that we don't load the local font as specified, but at least we no
longer reject such src properties in the CSS parser.
This makes the custom fonts used on http://apple.com/ actually load. :^)
