The property name in an object literal can either be a literal or a
computed name, in which case any AssignmentExpression can be used, we
now only parse AssignmentExpression instead of the previous incorrect
behaviour which allowed any Expression (Specifically, comma
expressions).
The addition of an is_generator parameter broke this, as is_strict was
being passed in, causing an assertion.
This is being addressed by changing it to an enum in #7981, but in the
meantime let's just fix these two cases.
Checking for this (and get()'ing it) is always invalid, so let's just
disallow it.
This also finds two bugs where the code is checking for types that can
never actually be in the variant (which was actually a refactor
artifact).
This patch changes the validation of RegExp flags (checking for
invalid and duplicate values) from a SyntaxError at runtime to a
SyntaxError at parse time - it's not something that's supposed to be
catchable.
As a nice side effect, this simplifies the RegExpObject constructor a
bit, as it can no longer throw an exception and doesn't have to validate
the flags itself.
SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized
way of representing file license information.
See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers
This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool.
ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
The auto naming of function expressions is a purely syntactic
decision, so shouldn't be decided based on the dynamic type of
an assignment. This moves the decision making into the parser.
One icky hack is that we add a field to FunctionExpression to
indicate whether we can autoname. The real solution is to actually
generate a CompoundExpression node so that the parser can make
the correct decision, however this would have a potentially
significant run time cost.
This does not correct the behaviour for class expressions.
Patch from Anonymous.
(...and ASSERT_NOT_REACHED => VERIFY_NOT_REACHED)
Since all of these checks are done in release builds as well,
let's rename them to VERIFY to prevent confusion, as everyone is
used to assertions being compiled out in release.
We can introduce a new ASSERT macro that is specifically for debug
checks, but I'm doing this wholesale conversion first since we've
accumulated thousands of these already, and it's not immediately
obvious which ones are suitable for ASSERT.
